Interpretation Of The Agreement Between Who And Egypt

10 Apr

1 It should not be forgotten that, at that time, Egypt had not even become a party to the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of Specialized Institutions, which it was not to ratify until later; Moreover, this general convention does not contain clauses comparable to those contained in an agreement establishing an organization on the territory of a host state, such as Articles III and X of the 1951 Convention [Article 56 of the Vienna Convention on Treaty Law appears in point 8 I.L.M 699 (1969). Article 56 of the draft articles of the Commission on International Law on treaties between states and international organizations or between international organizations is published on 18 I.L.M. 1605 (1979). Interpretation of the agreement between WHO and Egypt of 25 March 1951 2. If so, what are the legal powers of the World Health Organization and Egypt vis-à-vis the Alexandria regional office during the bienning and termination of the agreement? 1. Are the negotiating and advertising provisions in Section 37 of the 25 March 1951 agreement between the World Health Organization and Egypt applicable if any of the parties to the agreement wish to transfer the regional office out of Egypt?” [p.73] On the interpretation of the 25th decision The issues for which the Court`s opinion was sought were submitted to the Court by letter of May 21, 1980, received at the Registry on May 28, 1980 and received at the Registry on May 28, 1980. , addressed to the Clerk by the Director General of the World Health Organization [p. 74]. In that letter, the Director-General informed the Court of resolution WHA33.16 adopted by the World Health Assembly on 20 May 1980, Article 96, paragraph 2 of the United Nations Charter, Article 76 of the World Health Organization Constitution and Article X, paragraph 2, of the agreement between the United Nations and the World Health Organization. the organization decided to submit two questions to the Court for comment.

The text of this resolution reads: “The World Health Assembly, thirty-third, in light of proposals to remove from Alexandria the regional office of the eastern Mediterranean region of the World Health Organization, notes the differences of views expressed at the World Health Assembly on whether the World Health Organization has adopted the regional office without taking into account the provisions of Section 37 agreement between the World Health Organization and Egypt on 25 March 1951. , also noting that the Working Group of the Executive Council has not been able to make a judgment or recommendation on the applicability of Section 37 of this agreement, decides before making a decision on the removal of the regional office and, in accordance with Article 76 of the World Health Organization Constitution and Article X of the agreement between the United Nations and the World Health Organization , approved by the United Nations and the World Health Organization, approved by the World Health Organization. The UN General Assembly, On 15 November 1947, for its advisory opinion, to submit to the International Court of Justice the following questions: “1. Are the negotiating and publicity provisions in Section 37 of the 25 March 1951 agreement between the World Health Organization and Egypt applicable if any of the parties to the agreement wish the Regional Office to be transferred from the territory of Egypt? If so, what are the legal powers of the World Health Organization and Egypt with respect to the Alexandria regional office during the bienning year between the denunciation and the end of the agreement? ` ” 2.