Master Servant Agreement

10 Apr

Under Vicarious`s responsibility, a person may be held responsible for the injuries committed by another person if that person shares a Master Servant relationship with him or her. The servant acts in the name of his Lord and, therefore, the law of guilt provides that any illegitimate act committed by the servant in the course of employment is bound to hold the Lord accountable. There have been several audits to determine the relationship between the master and the officer, and the Court also applies its discretion on the facts of the case to determine such a relationship. Figure: If H works as a house cleaner for K, then there is a master-servant relationship between them, but if H instead of cleaning the house decides to cook the house, even if she was hired only for cleaning the house and because of her negligence causes a fire that also causes K`s neighbor, then K , does not fit because H did an act that was outside of his work. Master and Servant Acts were laws that were to govern relations between employers and employees in the 18th and 19th centuries. A United Kingdom Act of 1823 described its purpose as “better rules for servants, workers and workers.” This special law influenced labour relations and labour law in the United States, Australia (an 1845 law), Canada (1847), New Zealand (1856) and South Africa (1856). These laws are generally considered to be highly biased towards employers in order to discipline workers and eliminate the “combination” of workers in unions. Figure: In an IT company, programmers are employees of the company and there is a master quality relationship, but if the company has hired catering services, the company does not have a quality relationship, because the act of providing food is not an integral part of an IT business. The servant`s reign dates back to ancient Rome, where it was applied first to the acts of slaves, then to servants, animals and family members of the head of the family. It is not related to the laws of the United Kingdom of the 18th and 19th centuries, known as acts of master and servant or acts of control and service. and are subject to the Knowledge and Approval of the Master.

On the other hand, an independent contractor is an individual who issues a service contract with his own methods. He or she is therefore not subject to the control of the person who hired them. This is the general rule of offences, but in some situations a person may be held liable, even if he or she has done nothing wrong, if it is done by another person with whom he or she shares a particular relationship, such as a gentleman and servant or captain and enforcement officer, and in those cases, his liability is called alternate liability.